AAQEP Accreditation 2022
Standard 1 Aspect E
Standard 1e: Evidence shows that, by the time of program completion, candidates exhibit knowledge, skills, and abilities of professional educators appropriate to their target credential or degree, including: Creation and development of positive learning and work environments
Data Sources & Analysis
Data Source 1
Professional Competencies -- Organizing, Administering, and Maintaining a Department
Description of Data Source:
The observing and teaching agriculture classes competency requires candidates to obtain
copies of course of study and teaching plans used by their mentor teacher during their
first semester in their field placement (EHD 155A). They are to observe agriculture
science and agricultural mechanics classes, observe class management methods including
discipline, and take notes during observations and discuss with the mentor teacher.
Candidates are also required to develop lesson plans for assigned classes and teach
units of instruction as agreed upon with the mentor teacher.
Perspective Captured from Data Source: Candidate and Mentor Teacher
Rationale for using Data Source:
The organizing, administering, and maintaining a department competency requires candidates
to follow the organizational and administrative procedures of the local agriculture
department and learn the department procedures for: 1) ordering and purchasing supplies
and equipment, 2) handling disciplinary problems, 3) keeping and reporting mileage
traveled and submitting claims, 4) securing and using secretarial assistance in administering
the agriculture program, 5) taking roll and reporting attendance, 6) handling funds,
and 7) keeping classroom and office clean and orderly. Candidates are also required
to study the department filing system and budget and obtain a copy for their files.
They are also asked to analyze the instructional facilities available and collect
and preserve teaching materials.
Specific Elements of Data Source:
Organizing, Administering, and Maintaining a Department
Definition of Success for Each Element:
Candidates are asked to complete as many of the eleven competencies as they can.
The expectation is that candidates will complete all eleven competencies. Some candidates
may not complete all eleven items due to various circumstances. Mentor teachers provide
university coaches with feedback on each candidate’s performance in regard to meeting
expectations for professional competencies.
Displays of Analyzed Data:
Table 1: Cohort Mean Scores for EHD 155A Twelve Organizing, Administering, and Maintaining
a Department Professional Competencies
Professional Competencies | Fall 2019 N = 13 |
Spring 2020 N = 15 |
Fall 2020 N = 21 |
Spring 2021 N = 10 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Getting Established in the School | 10.92 | 10.38 | 10.92 | 10.90 |
Discovering Community and Student Needs in Developing Ag Ed Programs | 6.92 | 5.75 | 6.84 | 6.80 |
Observing and Teaching Agriculture Classes | 6.92 | 6.93 | 6.96 | 7.00 |
Out-of-Class Instruction and Supervision | 2.00 | 2.88 | 2.00 | 2.00 |
Guiding, Counseling, Selecting, and Placing Pupils | 3.00 | 2.25 | 3.00 | 3.00 |
Organizing, Administering, and Maintaining a Department | 11.00 | 10.44 | 10.69 | 10.60 |
Link to Full Dataset: EHD 155A Professional Competencies
Interpretation of Data:
The mean scores for each semester indicate that candidates were mostly successful
in completing all eleven competencies. Only seven candidates across all four years
completed fewer than eleven.
Data Source 2
Exit Evaluation of Professional Objective -- Future Farmers of America (FFA)
Description of Data Source:
During their second semester of their field placement (EHD 155B), candidates are expected
to complete professional objectives in six key areas as a way of developing the knowledge
and expertise needed to be a successful Ag Educator. Their progress gets monitored
on the Exit Evaluation of Professional Objectives. Each time the candidate accomplishes
one of the stated objectives, their mentor teacher initials the checklist near the
date to verify that the objective was accomplished. Mentor teachers provide university
coaches with feedback on each candidate’s performance in regard to meeting expectations
for the exit objectives.
Perspective Captured from Data Source: Candidate and Mentor Teacher
Rationale for using Data Source:
FFA is a student organization that is an integral part of the agricultural education
program. Agriculture teachers use the FFA local, state, and national events, activities,
and awards to promote student interest and enthusiasm for the agriculture program.
The FFA objectives call for the candidates to supervise FFA chapter activities, serve
as advisor at a chapter meeting, and participate in state and national FFA activities.
Three of the objectives evaluate candidates’ performance in the area of FFA.
Specific Elements of Data Source:
Total score for number of FFA objectives met
Definition of Success for Each Element:
Candidates are asked to complete as many of the FFA objectives as they can. The expectation
is that candidates will complete all three of the FFA objectives. Some candidates
may not complete all three objectives due to various circumstances. Mentor teachers
provide university coaches with feedback on each candidate’s performance in regard
to meeting expectations for exit objectives.
Displays of Analyzed Data:
Table 2: Cohort Mean Scores for EHD 155B Exit Evaluation of Professional Objectives
-- for Three FFA Objectives
Semester | N | Curriculum/ Instruction |
Manage- ment |
Guidance | Public Relations | FFA | Coordination |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fall 2019 | 13 | 14 | 5 | 5.85 | 4.92 | 2.85 | 4.77 |
Spring 2020 | 15 | 13.64 | 5.86 | 5.86 | 4.64 | 2.86 | 4.64 |
Fall 2020 | 17 | 13.94 | 5.82 | 6 | 5 | 2.88 | 4.59 |
Spring 2021 | 24 | 13.96 | 5.96 | 6 | 5 | 2.96 | 5 |
Link to Full Dataset: EHD 155B Exit Evaluation of Professional Objectives
Interpretation of Data:
During the last four semesters, all but four candidates completed all three of the
FFA objectives. Four candidates only completed three of the FFA objectives due to
restrictions imposed by the cooperating schools due to COVID-19. These three objectives
are essential for maintaining a successful FFA Chapter that promotes student interest
and involvement in the agriculture program.
Data Source 3
Mid Semester & Final Evaluations
Description of Data Source:
In their second semester of their field experience, candidates receive two formal
evaluations on their teaching from their university coach in collaboration with their
mentor teacher. One of these is completed during the mid-semester and the other is
completed at the end of the semester. Candidates are evaluated on five key areas:
maintaining effective environments, monitoring student learning and making adjustments
during lessons, addressing needs of all students, subject-specific pedagogy, and assessment.
Perspective Captured from Data Source: Mentor Teacher and University Coach
Rationale for using Data Source:
The EHD 155B Student Teaching in Secondary School Mid-Semester and Final Evaluation
rubric is completed by the mentor teacher and university coach collaboratively. In
doing so, the mentor and coach evaluate the candidate’s ability to maintain an effective
learning environment and their ability to monitor the learning environment and make
adjustments while teaching on a 4 point rubric scale.
Specific Elements of Data Source:
Two Rubric areas:
- Maintaining Effective Environments and Monitoring Student Learning
- Making Adjustments During Lessons
Definition of Success for Each Element:
Candidates are encouraged to strive for a score of four on the scoring rubric with
a program goal of candidates averaging scores of three or better. Candidates must
score a two or better on the rubric to meet the expectation for their EHD 155B Final
Evaluation and successful completion of their final student teaching.
Displays of Analyzed Data:
Table 3: EHD 155B Mid & Final Evaluations Spring 20-Spring 21
Spring 2020 | ||
Evaluation Criteria | Mid-Semester N = 15 |
Final Eval N = 15 |
Maintaining Effective Environments | 2.93 | 3.29 |
Monitoring Student Learning and Making Adjustments During Lessons | 2.71 | 3.21 |
Addressing Needs of All Students | 2.64 | 3.14 |
Subject-Specific Pedagogy | 2.86 | 3.07 |
Assessment | 3.00 | 3.07 |
Fall 2020 | ||
Evaluation Criteria | Mid-Semester N = 17 |
Final Eval N = 17 |
Maintaining Effective Environments | 2.88 | 3.05 |
Monitoring Student Learning and Making Adjustments During Lessons | 2.71 | 3.05 |
Addressing Needs of All Students | 2.65 | 2.94 |
Subject-Specific Pedagogy | 2.35 | 2.82 |
Assessment | 2.65 | 2.82 |
Spring 2021 | ||
Evaluation Criteria | Mid-Semester N = 24 |
Final Eval N = 24 |
Maintaining Effective Environments | 3.26 | 3.35 |
Monitoring Student Learning and Making Adjustments During Lessons | 2.96 | 3.17 |
Addressing Needs of All Students | 3.00 | 3.22 |
Subject-Specific Pedagogy | 2.96 | 3.17 |
Assessment | 2.78 | 3.47 |
Link to Full Dataset: EHD 155B Mid & Final Semester Evaluations Summary & Data
Interpretation of Data:
Spring 20, Fall 20 and Spring 21 candidates all showed notable increases in their
overall mean scores from their Mid-Semester to Final Evaluation in the areas of “Maintaining
Effective Environments” and Monitoring Student Learning and Making Adjustments During
Lessons.” Additionally, all three groups meet the program’s goal of 2.5 or better
overall average in the two criteria areas of interest.
Next Steps:
In order to address what we found we will continue to analyze the EHD 155A professional
competencies for organizing, administering, and maintaining a department and the exit
evaluation of professional objectives in the areas of curriculum and instruction data
we collect each year and discuss as program faculty how we might improve our candidates’
performance. We will continue to review all the competencies and objectives and make
changes as needed. Regarding the mid and final semester evaluations, we will analyze
the data and increase our focus on improving the areas with the lowest average scores.