EAD 262: Educational Leadership
Competency Task 1a: School-Wide Response Plan
Written Improvement Action Growth Plan
Grading Rubric
1 – Not Competent 2- Somewhat Competent 3- Competent
| Criteria | Descriptors | Competency Level 1-3 |
|---|---|---|
| Content: Overall | Plan demonstrates ability to use data to identify a need, make data-driven decisions and plan change. Selected focus for action is clearly defined, obtainable, significantand timely. | |
| Content: Background Data-Driven Decision Making | A strong case is made for the selection of the strategicaction. Data and other important, related information is used to assess and diagnose school needs, and may include district/ school non-negotiables (beliefs), policies, researched historical education trends, successful improvement/ reform actions, etc. | |
| Content: Aim, Vision, Theory of Action | Purpose of the action plan clearly targets the needs of the SED and/or EL learner population. Vision describes a future that encourages broad-based participation. Theory of action is research based and presented as a succinct If-Then statement that defines the approach to be taken. | |
| Content: Goals and Measures | Goals are clearly linked to the aim and vision. Measures tightly align with actions/strategies. Plan includes purposeful, frequent, collection of data and other information to determine progress, inform the system and make decisions | |
| Content: Action Strategies and Tasks |
Action strategies are clearly defined, align with goals and describe the how of the plan. Strategies progress, logically, toward goal attainment, specific to the strategic plan, defined and achievable. Tasks include clear, discrete actions. Timelines, owner(s) and resources (people, time, money, expertise, technology, materials, facilities, technology), are strategic, realistic and appropriate. |
|
| Content: Empowerment, Capacity Bldg, Communication |
Plan includes opportunities for meaningful collaboration with stakeholders and teacher active involvement in problem solving and decision-making. Attention is given to professional development and stakeholder training to build capacity. |
|
| Content: Systems Planning |
PSDA cycle of continuous improvement is applied strategically. Evidence supports use of the 7-Criteria, and other best practice planning, problem solving and decision-making protocols. |
|
| Structure, Grammar and Organization |
Written response applies appropriate grammar, punctuation and APA guidelines, including citations, References, Appendix and data tables/charts. |
Competency Task 1b: Strategic Improvement Actions
Improvement Action Plan Presentation
Grading Rubric
1 – Not Competent 2- Somewhat Competent 3- Competent
| Criteria | Descriptors | Competency Level 1-3 |
|---|---|---|
| Content: Background | A convincing argument is made supporting identified need and selection of opportunity for action. It is evident that research, data, and known best practices were used to develop the course of action. References are made to research, policies, readings and other resources. | |
| Content: Action Plan Components |
The what, why and how of the plan are clearly articulated, tied to PDSA cycle of improvement and include:
|
|
| Content: Assessment, Findings |
Written summary of findings demonstrate use of peer feedback and self-assessment to evaluate planning processes and written plan. |
|
| Presentation Format and Design |
Presentation clearly demonstrates thoughtful preparation. Information is succinct, strategic, and highlights major components of the plan. Information is presented in a logical, sequential order. Visuals explain, highlight and reinforce critical components of the strategic plan. PowerPoint slides are appealing and created with the audience in mind. |
|
| Presentation Skills |
Presentation appeals to the audience. Spoken word, voice inflection, gestures and word choice are used intentionally and strategically to sustain interest and help the audience understand and make connections. |
Competency Task 1c: School-Wide Response Plan
Communication Plan
Grading Rubric
1 – Not Competent 2- Somewhat Competent 3- Competent
| Criteria | Descriptors | Competency Level 1-3 |
|---|---|---|
| Content: Collaboration and Action Planning Process | Written communication plan based on district and state policies, including LCAP. | |
| Content: Written Plan |
Communications methods vary to inform and gather feedback about the improvement growth plan. Detailed explanation is given to justify purpose of communications and selection of communication methods. Clear links are drawn between communication methods, research and known best practices. |
|
| Content: Leadership Skills and Knowledge |
Content and messaging of communication |
|
| Structure, Grammar and Organization |
Writing applies appropriate grammar, punctuation and APA guidelines. Appendix and e-Portfolio include important artifacts and resources. |
Competency Task 2 (Field Experience): Facilitating Team-Building and Decision Making (CAPEs 1A; 1B; 1C; 3A; 3B; 3C; 4A; 4B)
Grading Rubric
1 – Not Competent 2- Somewhat Competent 3- Competent
| Criteria | Descriptors | Competency Level 1-3 |
|---|---|---|
| Content Background and Purpose | Purpose of the experience clear and includes a discussion of the importance problem solving and shared decisionmaking play in building cohesion, motivating for change and achieving results. Frequent references made to research and identified best practices. | |
| Content: Facilitation Preparation (Field Experience |
Description of and rational for selection of the Detailed explanation given for selection of two (2) or more protocols and processes to problem solve, build consensus and/or make decisions. |
|
| Content: Facilitation Analysis of Process (Field Experience) |
Rich reflection and detailed analysis of completed facilitation experience includes discussion of outcomes and effectiveness of each applied protocol, individually. Opportunities for growth reflect deep understanding of the role careful planning and
strategic selection and use of protocols play in facilitation effectiveness and success
of collaborative problem solving, consensus building and decision-making. A rich variety
of thoughtfully-selected evidence is analyzed, including, for example, participant
feedback, self-assessment, multi-media artifacts, behavior |
|
| Content: Leadership Knowledge and Skills |
Reflection includes discussion on overall level of |
|
| Structure, Grammar and Organization |
Writing applies appropriate grammar, punctuation and APA guidelines. Appendix and e-Portfolio include important artifacts and resources. |
This PDF is provided as a print-only reference document and may not be fully accessible to users of assistive technology. For more information, please visit Title II Rule on Digital Accessibility page.